| AlexFX810 a întrebat:

Salut, stiu ca poate e stanjenitor dar am niste lucruri nelamurite si as avea nevoie de ajutorul vostru. M-am masturbat destul de mult timp si destul de multe ori. Cei care au facut acelasi lucru aveti probleme de erectie, ejaculati precoce sau va cade parul? V-as fi recunoscator daca m-ati lua in serios. Momentan nu am probleme de genul dar vreau sa stiu pentru viitor. Va multumesc mult. Si inca o problema, masturbarea propriu zisa dureaza foarte putin, actul sexual a durat aproape 40 de minute cu mentiunea ca la primele 2 penetrari mi-a venit sa ma termin, m-am abtinut si dupa nu au mai fost probleme. Multumesc mult!

7 răspunsuri:
| RAY a răspuns:

Nu exista nici o dovada stiintifica ca dauneaza negativ masturbarea

| Seba2013 a răspuns (pentru RAY):

It is difficult to reconcile the view that masturbation improves mood with the findings in both sexes that greater masturbation frequency is associated with more depressive symptoms (Cyranowski et al., 2004; Frohlich&Meston, 2002; Husted&Edwards, 1976), less happiness (Das, 2007), and several other indicators of poorer physical and mental health, which include anxious attachment (Costa&Brody, 2011), immature psychological defense mechanisms, greater blood pressure reactivity to stress, and dissatisfaction with one's mental health and life in general (for a review, see Brody, 2010). It is equally difficult to see how masturbation develops sexual interests, when greater masturbation frequency is so often associated with impaired sexual function in men(Brody&Costa, 2009; Das, Parish,&Laumann, 2009; Gerressu, Mercer, Graham, Wellings,&Johnson, 2008; Lau, Wang, Cheng, & Yang, 2005; Nutter & Condron, 1985) and women (Brody &Costa, 2009; Das et al., 2009; Gerressu et al., 2008; Lau, Cheng, Wang, & Yang, 2006; Shaeer, Shaeer, & Shaeer, 2012; Weiss& Brody, 2009). Greater masturbation frequency is also associated with more dissatisfaction with relationships and less love for partners (Brody, 2010; Brody&Costa, 2009). In contrast, PVI is very consistently related to better health (Brody, 2010; Brody&Costa, 2009; Brody &Weiss, 2011; Costa & Brody, 2011, 2012), better sexual function (Brody & Costa, 2009; Brody & Weiss, 2011; Nutter&Condron, 1983, 1985; Weiss&Brody, 2009), and better intimate relationship quality (Brody, 2010; Brody&Costa, 2009; Brody &Weiss, 2011).

Moreover, although less risk of prostate cancer was associated with greater number of ejaculations (without specification of the sexual behavior) (Giles et al., 2003) [Note conflicting evidence, however: "Prostate cancer may be linked to sex hormones: Men who are more sexually active in their 20s and 30s may run a higher risk of prostate cancer, research suggests."], it is PVI frequency that is specifically associated with reduced risk, whereas masturbation frequency is more often related to increased risk (for a review on the subject, see Brody, 2010). In this regard, it is interesting to note that masturbation is also associated with other problems of the prostate (higher prostate specific antigen levels and swollen or tender prostate) and, compared with the ejaculate obtained from PVI, the ejaculate obtained from masturbation has markers of poorer prostatic function and lesser elimination of waste products (Brody, 2010). The only sexual behavior consistently related to better psychological and physical health is PVI. In contrast, masturbation is frequently associated with indices of poorer health (Brody, 2010; Brody&Costa, 2009; Brody&Weiss, 2011; Costa& Brody, 2011, 2012). There are several possible psychological and physiological mechanisms, which are a likely consequence of natural selection favoring health processes as cause and/or effect of motivation to search for, and capacity to obtain and enjoy, PVI. In contrast, selection of psychobiological mechanisms rewarding motivation to masturbate is unlikely due to the severe fitness costs that would occur if it deterred one from PVI by making it irrelevant for well-being (Brody, 2010). More plausibly, masturbation represents some failure of the mechanisms of sexual drive and intimate relatedness, however common it may be, and even if not uncommonly it coexists with access to PVI. In this regard, it is noteworthy that greater masturbation frequency is associated with dissatisfaction with several aspects of life independently of PVI frequency (Brody& Costa, 2009) and seems to diminish some benefits ofPVI(Brody, 2010).

Acuma exista?

| mihai69 a răspuns:

Eu am ceva vechime (peste 40 de ani) în „sportul" ăsta și pot spune că nu e nimic adevărat din tot ce se spune că pățești dacă te masturbezi.
Cum zice și reigrecdooșcinciteme - masturbarea nu dăunează decât pozitiv! rolling on the floor

| doctorandus a răspuns:

Exista un mijloc foarte simplu de a afla ce invata psihologii americani la facultate despre masturbare: deschizi http://myresource.phoenix.edu/......e_ch11.pdf pe urma deschizi documentul si apesi Ctrl-F si cauti dupa mastu.

http://ro.wikibooks.org/wiki/Medicin%C4%83/Masturbare
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Wt9OWlexso

| Oana92 a răspuns:

Dar nu zice ca o sa fii mai sanatos! Zice ca nu o sa ai probleme! Ce, daca faci sex de 50 de ori pe zi iti cade parul, orbesti, iti cade o mana sau alte cretineri care mai umbla prin popor?

Stiti sa folositi tehnologia dar nu puteti sa va faceti un upgrade la mentalitate!

| Seba2013 a răspuns (pentru Oana92):

Ba da spune, ca masturbarea DAUNEAZA POZITIV!
Aici vrea sa spuna ca masturbarea produce efecte pozitive.
Cand spune pozitive, se refera la sanatate nu la boli.

Nu stiu, incerca....masturbaeza-te de 50 de ori si ai sa vezi, cat iti rezista corpul la acesta presiune catabolica.

Esti constienta de reactiile care se produc in organism, atunci cand te masturbezi?
Sti sa imi spui ce hormoni si neurotramitatori, apar la excitatie sexuala?

| Seba2013 a răspuns:

Uite aici ce spun psihologii amercani.
http://www.asam.org/

Uite aici studii stiintifice:http://www.yourbrainonporn.com/......-hangover.

Astaia care te invata ca masturbarea nu cauzeaza nimic, habar nu au ce insemna excitatia sexuala.