Deci cartea dr. Eben Alexander "Dovada lumii de dincolo"e deja bestseller international. Povestea lui e la fel de magnifica si surprinzatoare.

Creierul doctorului Eben Alexander a fost atacat de o boala extrem de rara. Timp de sapte zile s-a aflat in coma. Apoi, tocmai cand doctorii se gandeau sa intrerupa tratamentul, ochii bolnavului s-au deschis brusc. Se intorsese in lumea aceasta.

Insanatosirea lui Alexander este un miracol medical. Dar adevaratul miracol al povestii sale se afla altundeva. Cat timp corpul lui a zacut in coma, Alexander a calatorit dincolo de aceasta lume si a intalnit o fiinta angelica. Aceasta l-a calauzit in cele mai departate taramuri ale existentei superfizice. Acolo s-a intalnit si a vorbit cu sursa Divina a universului insusi. Inainte de aceasta calatorie, el nu gasea impacare intre cunostintele de neurochirurg si credinta in ceruri, Dumnezeu sau suflet. Astazi, Alexander este convins ca adevarata sanatate nu poate fi dobandita decat atunci cand realizam ca Dumnezeu si sufletul sunt reale si ca moartea nu reprezinta sfarsitul existentei personale, ci doar o tranzitie.



http://www.descopera.ro/......iar-exista





Ce parere aveti de aceasta relatare si marturie minunata? E inca o dovada incotestabila ca viata dupa moarte exista.



A citit cineva cartea lui? Ce parere v-a facut?

In a 2013 investigation of Alexander's story and medical background, Esquire magazine reported that before the publication of Proof of Heaven, Alexander had been terminated or suspended from multiple hospital positions, and had been the subject of several malpractice lawsuits, including at least two involving the alteration of medical records to cover up a medical error.[13][14] The magazine also found what it claimed were discrepancies with regard to Alexander's version of events in the book. Among the discrepancies, according to an account of the Esquire article in Forbes, was that "Alexander writes that he slipped into the coma as a result of severe bacterial meningitis and had no higher brain activity, while a doctor who cared for him says the coma was medically induced and the patient was conscious, though hallucinating".[14][13][15]

Alexander responded: "I wrote a truthful account of my experiences in Proof of Heaven and have acknowledged in the book both my professional and personal accomplishments and my setbacks. I stand by every word in this book and have made its message the purpose of my life. Esquire's cynical article distorts the facts of my 25-year career as a neurosurgeon and is a textbook example of how unsupported assertions and cherry-picked information can be assembled at the expense of the truth."[15]

Alexander's book has been criticized by scientists, including Sam Harris who described Alexander's NDE account as "alarmingly unscientific," and that "everything – absolutely everything – in Alexander's account rests on repeated assertions that his visions of heaven occurred while his cerebral cortex was 'shut down', 'inactivated', 'completely shut down', 'totally offline', and 'stunned to complete inactivity'. The evidence he provides for this claim is not only inadequate – it suggests that he doesn't know anything about the relevant brain science."[16] "Even in cases where the brain is alleged to have shut down, its activity must return if the subject is to survive and describe the experience. In such cases, there is generally no way to establish that the NDE occurred while the brain was offline."[17] Neurologist and writer Oliver Sacks agreed with Harris, saying that "to deny the possibility of any natural explanation for an NDE, as Dr. Alexander does, is more than unscientific – it is antiscientific."..."The one most plausible hypothesis in Dr. Alexander's case...is that his NDE occurred not during his coma, but as he was surfacing from the coma and his cortex was returning to full function. It is curious that he does not allow this obvious and natural explanation, but instead insists on a supernatural one."[18]


Pe scurt, bate campii cu gratie "doctorul" asta.

Multi incearca sa-l discrediteze neconvenindu-le realitatea marturiei, atei ca si tine de altfel.Cand nu iti convine ceva sari cu argumente contra dar nu este adevarat nimic mai ales pentru faptul ca doctorul Eben nu avea niciun motiv sa minta, e fara sens, ilogic, mai ales ca s-a si convertit la credinta.

Mda, mai ales...

Atunci cand esti in coma, creierul produce hormoni care au efecte halucinogene.

De fapt, adevarul nu il stii nici tu, nici Holiday. De fapt, cea mai isteata abordarea e scepticismul si precautia, nu aprobarea orbeasca a unor povesti, doar ca e pe placul nostru. Nu e nici fara sens si nici ilogic ca respectivul sa fii mintit. De ce e ilogic sa minti pentru faima si bani?